In what sounded at times more like a sales pitch than a Richland City Council workshop meeting, City Parks and Facilities Director Joe Schiessl tried to sell the council on a contract the council approved on Dec. 15. 

Councilmembers clearly had second thoughts. 

Councilmember Michael Alvarez interrupted Schiessl’s presentation at the Jan. 26 meeting to say, “Why didn’t we get this workshop prior to Dec. 15, 2020 ?”

Schiessl responded, “That’s a great question. There are a lot of ways for staff and council to interact.”

Mayor Ryan Lukson said, “It’s clear that there was a policy decision made here and we didn’t have enough information.” He added, “No one on council knew we were making a tradeoff decision.”

The council’s Dec. 15 agenda packet included the contract and other information on pages 91-106.  No councilmember asked a question about it before they voted to approve it.

The contract allows American Cruise Line (ACL) to control the use of the Lee Street dock for the next 15 years for $45,000 the first year.

Schiessl said, “The city is out of the dock scheduling business.”

The contract leaves three other cruise companies, American Queens Steamboat Company (AQSC), Lindblad Expeditions, and Uncruise Adventures high and dry. 

ACL said in council documents that it predicts it will double the number of passengers it currently brings to Richland by adding two new vessels in 2022. 

Schiessl repeated the claim Tuesday as a way of justifying the contract. 

According to Schiessl, ACL currently brings about 12,000 passengers to Richland. AQSC brings 7,500, and the other two lines combined bring about 1,000.

ACL’s contract requires that it allows other cruise lines to make reservations one year in advance for dates that ACL doesn’t use.  

AQSC representative Eric Denley told the council Jan. 15 that his line prepares its schedule two or three years in advance. He said AQSC would not be able to dock here under the new contract. 

Denley expressed disappointment that his company was not included earlier in the discussions. 

AQSC and ACL’s websites show the companies are accepting reservations for 2022 cruises that come to the Richland dock.

Lee Street dock took three years to plan and build along the shoreline the city already owned. The dock was completed in 2004 and cost $591,000, not counting staff salaries. 

The city hasn’t charged user fees because the city looked at the dock as an economic development tool, Schiessl said. 

He estimated that with the possible increase in traffic from ACL in 2022, the cruise ships could bring $5.5 million in tourist dollars to the Tri-Cities area.

“ACL is digging deep and making very significant capital investment in ships,” Schiessl said. “They desire to have exclusive control of the facilities at every port of call.” 

He promoted the idea of a new dock to be built by ACL at Columbia Point and showed a conceptual drawing of the dock site, including commercial development around it and a city park, but he also admitted, “We certainly don’t have an agreement for a new dock or a timeframe.”

Councilmember Terry Christensen admitted that he probably should have asked more questions on Dec. 15.  He said he did not want to lose customers speculating on what might happen in the future. We’re taking care of the big guy instead of taking care of them all.  He asked, “Can we revise our agreement?”

Lukson, an attorney, said, “There’s no wiggle room in the contract.”

Councilmember Bob Thompson, also an attorney, added that contracts are not written to accommodate the whims of city councilmembers.

“Everybody is going to work together and hopefully we will reach a kumbaya moment,” Lukson said.

2 thoughts on “Parks Director tries to sell Richland City Council on dock contract it already approved. Members weren’t buying

  1. It sounds like a cop-out on Council’s part to not have properly studied the consent packets given to them before voting to pass them.

    That being said, it sounds an awful lot like Schiessl gave Council only enough information for them to rubber-stamp a contract decision he’d made on his own, without perhaps even the City Attorney being made aware of the nature of the binding aspect, or following ANY kind of RFP or bidding process. It’s lucky the other operators haven’t hit the city with an injunction, let alone a suit.

    What really gets me is this part, however:
    “…with the *possible* increase in traffic from ACL in 2022, the cruise ships could bring $5.5 million in tourist dollars to the Tri-Cities area.”
    A) Is there anything in this contract wherein ACL has annual minimums of passengers they must bring to the dock and unload? And, I DON’T mean unload, and promptly load them onto busses to take them out of city limits!
    B) I don’t give a rat’s ass how many $$$ ACL brings to the TRI-CITIES! This contract is for a RICHLAND property, that RICHLAND paid to build. Schiessl doesn’t work for Kennewick, Pasco, or West Richland. He works for Richland! How much money is this contract estimated to generate for RICHLAND? How many FTE jobs will this create and maintain in RICHLAND?

    Lord, 40-plus years of watching the Keystone Cops running this town, expecting it to get better…🙄

    Like

    1. Hi Blackie, thanks for your comments. I asked the city attorney if she had briefed the council on the dock contract and I got the “attorney/client dodge answer back.” As for A) the American Queen representative pointed out that American Cruise Lines could fulfill its contract by bringing just one ship to the dock!! ACL has about one-hundred, 8-day cruises to Richland listed in 2022, one every couple of days. I would be shocked if they can fill that many cruises at $5000 a pop. We’ll see. It’s hard to know how much of the “estimated” $5.5 million stays in Richland. The cruise lines does take excursions to Richland sites and I run into cruisers at the Richland Farmers Market occasionally. But excursions also go as far out of town as Pendleton. As for the Richland City Council, I’m reminded of something former Texas Agriculture Secretary once said, “Swim against the current, even a dead fish can go with the flow.” Unfortunately, the Richland City Council is usually comprised of seven dead fish. Thanks again for your comments.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s